| 80 | 0 | 118 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
美国提供了当前最大规模的空间目标轨道数据,并以TLE(Two Line Element)格式在网站上供全球用户下载。TLE数据作为空间态势感知领域的基础数据,对其精度研究较多,但时效性研究相对缺乏。基于2024年1月至2025年1月的公开TLE数据,本文分析了不同轨道空间目标的更新频率,研究发现:低轨卫星平均更新间隔为0.524 d,中轨卫星为0.950 d,高轨非同步卫星为1.262 d,呈显著正相关;同步轨道卫星尽管位于高轨,但平均更新间隔(0.760 d)较短;4种导航系统卫星更新频率存在差异,GLONASS(0.857 d)和GPS(0.958 d)高于北斗(0.981 d)和Galileo(1.597 d)。研究结果表明,美国空间监测系统对不同轨道目标的监测能力存在差异,这对评估其空间态势感知能力具有重要参考价值。
Abstract:The United States provides the largest collection of orbital data for space objects in TLE(Two Line Element) format, available for global users to download. As fundamental data for space situational awareness research, it is significant to analyze TLE data update frequency for evaluating its space surveillance capabilities, however, research on its timeliness remains relatively insufficient. Based on public TLE data from January 2024 to January 2025, this study systematically analyzes the update frequency and statistical characteristics of space objects at different orbital altitudes. The study finds that the average update interval for Low Earth Orbit satellites is 0.524 d, for Medium Earth Orbit satellites is 0.950 d, and for High Orbit Non-synchronous Satellites is 1.262 d, showing a significant positive correlation with orbit attitude. Although geosynchronous satellites are in high orbit, their average update interval is significantly shorter(0.760 d). The update frequencies of the four major navigation satellite systems show significant differences: GLONASS(0.857 d) and GPS(0.958 d) have higher update frequency than Beidou(0.981 d) and Galileo(1.597 d). The results indicate that the US space surveillance system has varying monitoring capabilities for objects in different orbits, which is of significant reference value for evaluating its space situational awareness capacity.
[1]汤靖师,程昊文.空间碎片问题的起源、现状和发展[J].物理,2021,50(5):317-323.
[2]李明,龚自正,刘国青.空间碎片监测移除前沿技术与系统发展[J].科学通报,2018,63(25):2570-2591.
[3]王若璞,张浚哲,郑勇,等.基于TLE的空间目标碰撞预警计算[J].测绘科学技术学报,2009,26(4):269-271,275.
[4]段玉瑞,孙振江,王建伟,等.地球轨道空间碰撞风险区域态势分析[J].力学与实践,2022,44(6):1279-1285.
[5]NAPPER I E,DAVIES A J,JAH M,et al.Protect Earth′s orbit:Avoid high seas mistakes[J].Science,2023,379(6636):990-991.
[6]付毅飞.我国公开空间站TLE轨道根数专家:明智之举[N].科技日报,2022-02-16(1).
[7]吴功友,王家松,刘芳,等.利用长期TLE数据判定同步轨道卫星状态[C]//中国卫星导航系统管理办公室,科学技术部高新技术发展及产业化司,国防科工局系统工程一司,等.第四届中国卫星导航学术年会论文集-S3精密定轨与精密定位.西安:西安卫星测控中心宇航动力学国家重点实验室,2013:39-43.
[8]刘璐,王浩.美国地基空间目标雷达监视系统浅析[J].国际太空,2022(4):50-55.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13367/j.cnki.sdgc.2026.02.005
中图分类号:V528
引用信息:
[1]劳振迪,赵相雷,陈星硕,等.空间目标公开TLE根数的时效性分析[J].山东理工大学学报(自然科学版),2026,40(02):16-20.DOI:10.13367/j.cnki.sdgc.2026.02.005.
基金信息:
山东省自然科学基金面上项目(ZR2023MD098); 大地测量与地球动力学国家重点实验室开放基金项目(SKLGED2024-3-5); 山东省高等学校“青创团队计划”项目(2022KJ224)