| 10 | 0 | 143 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为研究黄泛平原区细粒土路基强夯时粉质黏土与粉土的加固特性,以聊城市绕城段改建工程为依托,选取了粉质黏土、粉土1、粉土2三种代表性土样。通过室内液塑限、击实、直剪及固结试验获取土体力学参数,采用Abaqus有限元软件建立强夯数值模型(夯锤尺寸2.5 m×1 m、土体模型5 m×5 m×5 m),以夯沉量、有效加固范围及应力分布为评价指标,对比分析了1 000 kN·m与1 500 kN·m夯击能对不同土样的加固效果。研究结果表明:三种土样沉降量均随夯击次数呈先增后稳趋势,1 000 kN·m夯击能下粉质黏土最佳夯击次数为7次,粉土为6次;相同夯击能下,粉质黏土夯沉量更小(1 000 kN·m下第7击累计夯沉量55.7 cm,粉土达64.7~66.1 cm),抗压缩性更强;提高夯击能时,粉土有效加固范围增幅(21.2%~22.5%)远大于粉质黏土(4.6%),对夯击能敏感度更高;应力传播上,粉质黏土竖向应力衰减慢(峰值204.5 kPa,平稳阶段130.0 kPa),粉土侧向应力扩散能力强(峰值距夯锤中心1.20~1.25 m)。
Abstract:In order to study the reinforcement characteristics of silty clay and silt during dynamic compaction of fine-grained soil subgrade in the Yellow River flood plain area, three representative soil samples of silty clay, silt 1, and silt 2 were collected based on the reconstruction project of Liaocheng City. Soil mechanical parameters were obtained through laboratory liquid-plastic limit, compaction, direct shear and consolidation tests. Abaqus finite element software was used to establish a dynamic compaction numerical model(rammer ruler: 2.5 m×1 m; soil model: 5 m×5 m×5 m). Using the tamping settlement, effective reinforcement range and stress distribution as evaluation indexes, the reinforcement effects of 1 000 kN·m and 1 500 kN·m tamping energy on different soil samples were compared and analyzed. The results show that the settlement of the three soil samples increases first and then stabilizes with the number of tamping times. The optimal number of tamping times is 7 times for silty clay and 6 times for silt under 1000 kN·m. Under the same tamping energy, silty clay exhibited smaller cumulative settlement(55.7 cm after the 7th impact under 1 000 kN·m, compared to 64.7~66.1 cm for silt), and stronger compression resistance. When the tamping energy was increased, the effective reinforcement range of silt(21.2%~22.5%) was much greater than that of silty clay(4.6%), indicating silt is more sensitive to tamping energy. In terms of stress propagation, the vertical stress attenuation of silty clay is slower(peak value : 204.5 kPa, stable stage : 130.0 kPa), while silt exhibited stronger lateral stress diffusion ability, with the peak occurring 1.20~1.25 m away from the rammer center.
[1]陈天帅.公路工程施工中常见路基病害防治技术分析[C]//第十届工程技术管理与数字化转型学术交流会论文集.[出版地不详]:广西网络安全和信息化联合会,2025:332-334.
[2]赵亮.路基工程质量通病不足点及预控措施[J].建材与装饰,2017(19):257-258.
[3]李孟,冯美军,曲恒辉,等.山东地区黄河冲积平原粉土的分布规律及工程特性调研[J].黑龙江科学,2024,15(10):32-34.
[4]谭菊萍.黄河冲积平原灌溉入渗研究[J].地质调查与研究,2013,36(4):299-304.
[5]Ghanbari E,Hamidi A.Numerical modeling of rapid impact compaction in loose sands[J].Geomechanics and Engineering,2014,6(5):487-502.
[6]Moon J S,Jung H S,Lee S,et al.Ground improvement using dynamic compaction in sabkha deposit[J].Applied Sciences,2019,9(12):2506.
[7]贾剑青,贾超,赖远明,等.高速铁路路基加固效果及稳定性分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2020,30(6):50-56.
[8]李春林.基于数值模拟的软黏土地基处理方法研究[J].中国新技术新产品,2025(2):116-118.
[9]姚占勇,周冲,蒋红光,等.基于帽盖模型的强夯地基应力–应变特征与有效加固范围分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2018,37(4):969-977.
[10]徐剑佩,谭勇锋,陶耀东,等.强夯作用下边坡动力响应模型试验和数值模拟[J].科学技术与工程,2023,23(33):14314-14321.
[11]姚仰平,张北战.基于体应变的强夯加固范围研究[J].岩土力学,2016,37(9):2663-2671.
[12]张信,戴志峰,邹梦超.深厚回填土地基强夯效果数值模拟研究[J].建筑技术,2025,56(4):445-449.
[13]夏天,赵海燕,成词峰,等.基于数值模拟的高填方红黏土地基强夯试验研究[J].水力发电,2024,50(9):36-43.
[14]赵向阳.强夯法地基加固的数值模拟[D].邯郸:河北工程大学,2022.
[15]Souza T D F,Pasqual R P S.New method to predict crater depth obtained in dynamic compaction[J].Geotechnical and Geological Engineering,2021,39(5):1-13.
[16]Zhou C,Yang C J,Qi H,et al.Evaluation on improvement zone of foundation after dynamic compaction[J].Applied Sciences,2021,11(5):2156.
[17]刘文俊,李岳,蔡靖,等.基于强夯应力波传播模型的夯击参数研究[J].岩土力学,2023,44(S1):427-435.
[18]李岳,刘文俊,蔡靖,等.强夯置换的ALE法仿真与夯击参数研究[J].岩土工程学报,2023,45(7):1471-1479.
[19]徐宏.强夯加固黄土地基动力传播规律及加固效果研究[D].兰州:兰州交通大学,2022.
[20]李慧.高速公路拓宽地基强夯加固与气囊隔振技术研究[D].济南:山东大学,2021.
[21]缑振国.强夯法在公路路基施工中的应用[J].科技创新与生产力,2023,44(8):67-70.
[22]袁永红.强夯法在公路路基施工中的应用探析[J].汽车周刊,2025(7):59-61.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13367/j.cnki.sdgc.2026.06.005
中图分类号:U416.1
引用信息:
[1]薛熠,成宇,贾江华,等.粉质黏土与粉土强夯沉降及应力传播特性研究[J].山东理工大学学报(自然科学版),2026,40(06):32-40.DOI:10.13367/j.cnki.sdgc.2026.06.005.
2025-10-29
2025
2025-12-10
2025-12-17
2025
1
2026-07-21
2026-07-21